<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The 4-Hour Workweek Journal &#187; Organization</title>
	<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com</link>
	<description>One man's experiment in lifestyle design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Google Calendar From The Desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/10/google-calendar-from-the-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/10/google-calendar-from-the-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google Calendar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/10/google-calendar-from-the-desktop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the weekend I discussed how I have deeply synchronized my desktop email client with Gmail. I did this because Gmail acts as my central mailbox for all of my email accounts, of which I have many. It should probably come as no surprise that my love affair with Google does not end with email. [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Google Calendar From The Desktop", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/10/google-calendar-from-the-desktop/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the weekend <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/">I discussed</a> how I have deeply synchronized my desktop email client with Gmail. I did this because Gmail acts as my <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/">central mailbox</a> for all of my email accounts, of which I have many. It should probably come as no surprise that my love affair with Google does not end with email. I am also a huge fan of <a href="http://www.google.com/calendar">Google Calendar</a>, which I use extensively for three purposes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Scheduling and setting reminders for my appointments.</li>
<li>Sharing my calendar with others.</li>
<li>Keeping track of <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/15/all-the-things-i-do/">all the things I do</a> when I feel the need to &#8220;audit&#8221; how I am spending my time.</li>
</ul>
<ul>There are all kinds of useful features available with Google Calendar, such as integration with Gmail, Managing invitations and reminders, supporting multiple calendars (e.g. one calendar for work, another for home), sharing calendars, etc. These benefits have been described <a href="http://www.thinkvitamin.com/reviews/webapps/google-calendar">elsewhere</a>. Instead I wanted to discuss how I have synchronized my Google Calendar with my desktop calendar.</ul>
<p>For my desktop calendar I use <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/">Lightning</a>, which is a <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a> add-on. The Lightning extension basically integrates <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird/">Sunbird</a>, Mozilla&#8217;s calendar application, into Thunderbird which is my desktop email client. To synch my Google calendars with Lightning, I use another Thunderbird add-on: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4631">Provider</a>. The Provider extension allows Thunderbird/Lightning to read and write events in your Google calendars. A great tutorial on how to set this up can be found <a href="http://bfish.xaedalus.net/?p=239">here</a>. <a href="http://gcaldaemon.sourceforge.net/index.html">GCALDaemon</a> can also be used to synch desktop calendars with your Google calendars. Besides Thunderbird/Sunbird, it also supports synching with other email clients such as Evolution and Apple&#8217;s iCal. I just find the Provider add-on easier to install and use.</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Google+Calendar+From+The+Desktop&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F02%2F10%2Fgoogle-calendar-from-the-desktop%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/10/google-calendar-from-the-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMail From The Desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thunderbird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post regarding the consolidation of multiple email accounts into a single inbox, I mentioned that I use Gmail as my central mailbox. I also mentioned that because Gmail supports IMAP, you can use both the Gmail web interface and a desktop email client to send and receive email while keeping both in [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "GMail From The Desktop", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/">previous post</a> regarding the consolidation of multiple email accounts into a single inbox, I mentioned that I use Gmail as my central mailbox. I also mentioned that because Gmail supports IMAP, you can use both the Gmail web interface and a desktop email client to send and receive email while keeping both in synch. I wanted to expand on exactly how I keep my desktop email client synchronized with my Gmail account.</p>
<p>Before we get started, one rather obvious question is, why use a desktop email client at all? After all, if you are using Gmail as your central mailbox, you could just as easily access Gmail from a web browser on your desktop - synchronization problem solved! That&#8217;s a legitimate point. Scott MacGregor, Thunderbird&#8217;s lead engineer, makes a <a href="http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2007/04/thunderbirdqa_0409">good case</a> for preferring desktop email clients over webmail. All I can say is that, while I love Gmail, desktop email clients just seem to <em>feel</em> better.</p>
<h3>Using Thunderbird</h3>
<p>I am going to cover using Thunderbird, Mozilla&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/">cross-platform e-mail application</a>. It is based on the same technology as their <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox</a> browser. It has great filtering and junk mail features as well as the ability to be customized via add-ons. </p>
<p>The first thing you need to do is <a href="https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77695">enable IMAP</a> on your Gmail or Google Apps for your Domain (GAFYD) email account. You then need to do a basic setup in Thunderbird for fetching Gmail via IMAP. This is covered in another <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77662">Google tutorial</a>. The key is <em>not</em> to use the Gmail option when setting up the account in Thunderbird:</p>
<p><a title="Account Wizard" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23505519@N02/2252097859/"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 3px 0px" alt="Account Wizard" src="http://static.flickr.com/2341/2252097859_9c7c7b05d2.jpg" border="0"></a></p>
<p>The basic setup, and also some commentary on using a desktop client vs. the web interface for Gmail is covered in the following video: </p>
<p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:d0b1daef-d474-4d0f-924a-8b1c773ebbac" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div id="437389e9-4af6-48bc-8d58-63fe30497de4" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab6qz6QcFhk" target="_new"><img src="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/videoaf6c905e8640.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('437389e9-4af6-48bc-8d58-63fe30497de4'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;350\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/ab6qz6QcFhk\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;wmode\&quot; value=\&quot;transparent\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/ab6qz6QcFhk\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; wmode=\&quot;transparent\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;350\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/object&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So far so good. At this point, we are successfully using Thunderbird, a desktop email client, to access our Gmail. Most importantly, our desktop and web based Gmail are completely synchronized - if you make a change in Gmail via the web based interface, it will be reflected in your desktop email client, and vice versa.</p>
<h3>Thunderbird Tweaks</h3>
<p>You could stop here, but that would be too easy! By default Thunderbird uses its own folders for handling sent mail, drafts and trash. We want Thunderbird to store these emails in the same place as the web based Gmail. We also want items identified as junk by Thunderbird to be tagged as spam in Gmail. All of this is addressed here in Lifehacker&#8217;s <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/geek-to-live/turn-thunderbird-into-the-ultimate-gmail-imap-client-314574.php">Turn Thunderbird into the Ultimate Gmail IMAP Client</a> article.</p>
<p>If you also use Gmail as a central mailbox for sending email from multiple email accounts (like me), you will need to add these other email addresses to your Gmail account in Thunderbird by using the <a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/03/thunderbirds-most-underrated-feature-identities/">Manage Identities</a> feature. When composing an email, you can then select from which address the message will be sent (technically it is sent from Gmail, but the reply-to address will be the one you picked). One nice feature in Thunderbird that is not available in the web based Gmail is the ability to have different signatures for each identity - one more reason you might prefer desktop to web based access.</p>
<p>A lot of people might now stop here. After all, Thunderbird and your web based Gmail are perfectly synched. However, in Thunderbird, if you go to write a new email, there is no auto-complete of all the email addresses you used in the web based interface. The problem is that your Gmail contacts are not accessible from Thunderbird (yet!).</p>
<h3>Contacts</h3>
<p>This is a tough one. One thing you can do is export your Gmail contacts to a file and import these into your Thunderbird address book. However, this is a completely manual process. For example, if you add new addresses into your Gmail contacts you will need to re-import them into Thunderbird.</p>
<p>One elegant solution is to use <a href="http://gcaldaemon.sourceforge.net/">GCALDaemon</a> to <em>access</em> your Google contacts from Thunderbird. Notice that I did not say synchronize. If you go with this method, you have probably made a decision to keep your master list of contacts on the web. This is a decision I made because, I want my contacts available to me everywhere, especially when I am away from my desktop. For lack of a better solution, and mostly because of my use of Gmail as a central mailbox, I use my Gmail contacts as my main contact repository.</p>
<p>Thunderbird can access network based contacts via LDAP. Unfortunately Gmail by itself does not provide LDAP access, but GCALDaemon allows you to run an LDAP server locally that can access your Google contacts. Thunderbird can connect to this local LDAP source to get at your Google contacts. How to do this is covered in a GCALDaemon <a href="http://gcaldaemon.sourceforge.net/usage4.html#top">usage guide</a> (assuming you have in fact downloaded and installed GCALDaemon!). Note that steps 1-3 can be skipped, and instead of modifying text based configuration files, you can set everything up in the more user friendly graphical <strong>GCALDaemon Config Editor</strong> (which can be accessed from your Windows Start menu):</p>
<p><a title="gcalconfig" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23505519@N02/2252997460/"><img alt="gcalconfig" src="http://static.flickr.com/2167/2252997460_c7bd02d585.jpg" border="0"></a></p>
<p>In this window, select the <strong>LDAP server</strong> tab on the left. Click on the <strong>Enable LDAP server and Gmail contact importer</strong> label to ensure LDAP will be enabled. Select your Gmail&nbsp; <a title="gcalaccountsbutton" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23505519@N02/2252199123/"><img alt="gcalaccountsbutton" src="http://static.flickr.com/2159/2252199123_9cfebe9ce9.jpg" align="left" border="0"></a>account. You can press the Account button to add a new Gmail account (it is very simple). Now go back to step 4 in the <a href="http://gcaldaemon.sourceforge.net/usage4.html#top">usage guide</a> to complete the setup in Thunderbird. One last thing, you actually have to <em>start</em> the GCALDaemon server. This is done from the command line (I know - very unfriendly!):</p>
<p><a title="gcalstart" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23505519@N02/2252199107/"><img alt="gcalstart" src="http://static.flickr.com/2074/2252199107_457a3cb6b3.jpg" border="0"></a></p>
<p>It seems like a lot, but until Gmail provides access to contacts (for example, a nice Thunderbird Add-on would be cool), this is actually a pretty workable solution. Once it is set up, you don&#8217;t have to do anything.</p>
<h3>Managing Contacts</h3>
<p>On a related topic, I am wondering what others are doing to manage their contacts. For me, I want to have access from both my desktop and from the web to a single contact list. I am not so sure GMail contacts is the best contact manager (in fact, it seems very under-featured). I am also having an issue with trying to seamlessly synchronize my <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000H1F9IA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=B000H1F9IA">CardScan</a> contacts with my master Gmail contact list (for now I am doing regular imports into my Gmail contacts from CardScan, although CardScan does synchronize with their free web-based <a href="http://www.cardscan.net/">CardScan@Your Service</a> contact manager application). How about <a href="http://www.plaxo.com">Plaxo</a> - anyone using that? It seems you can <a href="http://support3.plaxo.com/al/12/1/article.asp?aid=1028&amp;n=1&amp;tab=search&amp;bt=4n&amp;s=1">synch between Plaxo and Thunderbird</a>, but I don&#8217;t think you can access your Plaxo address book from Gmail.</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=GMail+From+The+Desktop&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F02%2F08%2Fgmail-from-the-desktop%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/08/gmail-from-the-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scan &#38; Toss</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/04/scan-toss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/04/scan-toss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elimination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/04/scan-toss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was cleaning out my office, I ended up with a small pile of ticket stubs from sporting events I have attended throughout the years. When you think about it, these things have no real practical use. However for me, and I suspect many others, ticket stubs maintain some real sentimental value like a [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Scan &#38; Toss", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/04/scan-toss/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was cleaning out my office, I ended up with a small pile of ticket stubs from sporting events I have attended throughout the years. When you think about it, these things have no real practical use. However for me, and I suspect many others, ticket stubs maintain some real sentimental value like a photograph might have. One idea that came to mind was to put all of these in a <a href="http://unclutterer.com/2007/12/27/organize-ticket-stubs-in-a-dedicated-diary/">dedicated scrapbook</a>, but I figured that would end up just gathering dust on a shelf. This of course begs the question: why not just throw them out? Honestly, that would probably work, but I just could not let go of them&#8230;the memories!</p>
<p><a title="Ticket Stub" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23505519@N02/2243710673/"><img style="margin: 0px 15px 15px 0px" alt="Ticket Stub" src="http://static.flickr.com/2014/2243710673_a02a275912.jpg" align="left" border="0"></a>Where do we keep photographs these days? If you are like me, they are all stored digitally. In fact, I have gone out of my way to scan old photos so that they can be stored centrally and digitally with the rest of my photo collection. In a moment of epiphany, it occurred to me that I could simply scan my ticket stubs just like I have scanned old photos! Best of all, these images can be organized with the rest of me photo collection in <em>a single place</em>! </p>
<p>As I further processed my pile of papers in my office I came across magazines I had been keeping because of one particular article, or perhaps a specific picture (for example pictures from house &amp; home style magazines that serve as inspiration for an imagined home renovation). I already knew what to do: scan and toss!</p>
<p>On your mission to de-clutter, keep in mind that if you cannot throw stuff out, some things can be stored or organized <em>digitally </em>instead of physically. I know for me, the scan &amp; toss option has been completely overlooked in the past. What do you do to organize your old ticket stubs, magazine articles and similar keepsakes?</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Scan+%26amp%3B+Toss&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F02%2F04%2Fscan-toss%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/04/scan-toss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Desk Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/03/clean-desk-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/03/clean-desk-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/03/clean-desk-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a feeling this guy is not on any kind of information diet! Mr. Gore is not the only one whose workspace has been overtaken by clutter. Up until last week, my office was more of an exercise in entropy than a place to work. After having been inspired by a post in Lodewijk [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Clean Desk Policy", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/03/clean-desk-policy/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling <a href="http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1622338_1363003,00.html">this guy</a> is not on any kind of information diet! Mr. Gore is not the only one whose workspace has been overtaken by clutter. Up until last week, my office was more of an exercise in entropy than a place to work. After having been inspired by a <a href="http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/the-benefits-of-a-clean-desk-and-a-tidy-office.html">post</a> in Lodewijk van den Broek&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/">How to Be an Original</a> blog, I set to work a week ago to rid my workspace of clutter.</p>
<p>While I have sought to rid my house of unnecessary clutter, I have had a bit of a psychological block when it came to my office. Subconsciously, I think I have always equated <strong>lots</strong> of information with intelligence, importance and self value. Basically, in my mind:</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Information Overload = Smart Person = Messy Desk</strong></p>
<p>Al Gore&#8217;s desk reminds me of the <a href="http://www.artnet.com/artwork/423879543/744/einsteins-desk-princeton.html">work spaces</a> of most of my university professors - stacks of academic journals on their desks, books and papers literally falling out of the bookcases. I think back to one of the most intelligent fellows I have ever worked with in the banking industry: he ran out of horizontal surfaces at arm level, so started piling stuff on the floor! I think over time I just developed this sense that the messier one&#8217;s workspace, the more important, intelligent and productive they must be&#8230;so I set off to replicate that kind of environment.</p>
<p>As luck would have it, experts have recently reinforced my unconscious correlation between messy desks and smart people. In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316013994?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0316013994">A Perfect Mess</a> by Eric Abrahamson and David H. Freedman, the authors actually argue that a messy desk can be an attribute of an effective worker. As they point out in the book, &#8220;Einstein&#8217;s desk at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJ, was maintained&#8230;in a stupendous disarray.&#8221; The book suggests that messiness can be related to higher education and higher salaries.</p>
<p>Expert opinions aside, I think my messy office became more a source of stress than a higher salary. All of the papers and files piled on my desk simply suggested things <em>to myself</em> like disorder, incompleteness, and distraction. </p>
<p>My process for cleaning my office pretty much amounted to putting everything in my office into one big pile and processing them one at a time into the following categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>Garbage</li>
<li>Store/archive</li>
<li>Organize</li>
</ul>
<ul>I&#8217;ll touch on how I dealt with organization in a later post, but I will tell you it took me a week to get through everything! However, I just wanted to mention that today is Day 1 of my clutter free office! So far, it is mentally refreshing to work without the visual distraction of all that clutter. For inspiration on your own workspaces, check out <a href="http://unclutterer.com/2008/01/25/workspace-of-the-week-black-and-white-class-and-glass/">Unclutterer&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/unclutterer/pool/">Flickr Workspaces Pool</a>. What do you think? Are Abrahamson and Freedman right or did I do the right thing by cleaning up?</ul>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Clean+Desk+Policy&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F02%2F03%2Fclean-desk-policy%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/02/03/clean-desk-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Email</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I was reading The Four Hour Trial where he laments over having to check email on multiple email accounts. The 4-Hour Workweek counsels us to immediately implement a personal policy of checking email only twice a day (with the ultimate goal of checking even less frequently - author Tim Ferriss boasts of [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Managing Email", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I was reading <a href="http://fourhourtrial.blogspot.com/">The Four Hour Trial</a> where he <a href="http://fourhourtrial.blogspot.com/2008/01/updates.html">laments</a> over having to check email on multiple email accounts. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">The 4-Hour Workweek</a> counsels us to immediately implement a personal policy of checking email only twice a day (with the ultimate goal of checking even less frequently - author Tim Ferriss boasts of checking email only once a week!). Whether you check email once a month or once an hour, the mechanics of having to log into four, five or six different email accounts <em>is</em> a nuisance. Not everyone will have multiple email accounts, but if you are one of the many that do, what follows is for you! </p>
<p><em>Note: Most of this derives from a comment I had originally made on The Four Hour Trial&#8217;s post. Since this system works so well for me, I felt it was worth repeating here.</em></p>
<p>Here is my system to deal with having multiple email addresses that is almost painless. The real trick was being able to both send and receive email for <em>all of my email addresses</em> from a central inbox.</p>
<h3>The Central Inbox</h3>
<p>There could be many candidates for a central inbox. If you exclusively access email from the desktop on a single computer, and all of your email addresses can be accessed via POP, your email client, such as Outlook, could serve as your central inbox. I chose <a href="http://mail.google.com">Gmail</a> as my central inbox for a few reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Web and desktop access.</li>
<li>Superior SPAM protection.</li>
<li>Superior search capabilities.</li>
<li>Ability to tag email versus filing email in a folder.</li>
<li>Lots of storage.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you choose to use Gmail as your central inbox, you will need a Gmail account. If you are managing the actual domain to which one of your email addresses belongs (for example, you have started your own business or venture), consider setting up <a href="https://www.google.com/a/">Google Apps for your Domain</a> and having Google host that domain&#8217;s email. By using Google Apps for your Domain, you will not need to get an additional @gmail.com email address.</p>
<h3>Sending Email</h3>
<p>You can setup Gmail to send email from all of your email accounts. By the way, this is also possible in many desktop clients as well, but I like using Gmail as my central inbox, so I will be describing the process using Gmail. In your Gmail settings, you simply add your other email accounts to Gmail. This will cause Gmail to send a verification email to your other accounts. You should then access your email at the other accounts the way you have in the past to complete the verification process (basically replying to the verification email proves you are the owner of the email account you are trying to add to Gmail). Once verified, you will be able to send email from your other email accounts from within Gmail.</p>
<h3>Receiving Email</h3>
<p>Receiving email sent to your other email accounts in the Gmail inbox requires you to either <em>forward</em> those emails to Gmail, or <em>download</em> those emails to Gmail. Forwarding email from all your other accounts into Gmail can be done in a couple of different ways: </p>
<ul>
<li>Having your system administrator setup forwarding on the actual email server, forwarding email directly to your Gmail account.</li>
<li>Most web based email will allow you to setup automatic forwarding of email to another email account. In this case forward to your Gmail account.</li>
</ul>
<p>Gmail can also act as an email client for other email accounts. Instead of forwarding email to Gmail, you can actually download email into Gmail. There is a setting in Gmail for downloading email from another account into Gmail using POP, much like how you would use Outlook to get email from an email account.</p>
<h3>Living The Dream</h3>
<p>You can now send and receive email from all of your email accounts using Gmail. Since Gmail supports IMAP, you can use both the Gmail web interface <em>and</em> a desktop email client (like Outlook or Thunderbird) to send and receive email while keeping both in synch.&nbsp; You can also use POP to download Gmail into a desktop client for offline viewing (selecting the option to keep a copy on the server ensures that you maintain a copy in Gmail).</p>
<p>I understand that some people may be uncomfortable with depending on Google for handling all of their email. Like I said, there are other ways to implement the concept of a central inbox using other tools. I just happen to like Gmail a lot. Gmail provides much more storage than most email providers. As a result I <em>never</em> throw out an email, and I am currently only using 12% of my storage quota! By being able to search through all of this mail using Google search, I can find dated material in a matter of seconds, all the time, no matter where I am. In the end, it might not be absolutely perfect, but this system works really well for me.</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Managing+Email&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F01%2F19%2Fmanaging-email%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/19/managing-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single Tasking</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/16/single-tasking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/16/single-tasking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[4-Hour Work Week]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/16/single-tasking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a keynote speech to top CEO&#8217;s and government officials at the New New Internet Conference in Washington DC, 4-Hour Workweek author Timothy Ferriss makes the claim that people with the most time and the highest incomes are characterized by the ability to single task: focusing on the truly important, without interruption, to completion. Here [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Single Tasking", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/16/single-tasking/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a keynote speech to top CEO&#8217;s and government officials at the <a href="http://tnni07.thenewnewinternet.com/">New New Internet Conference</a> in Washington DC, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">4-Hour Workweek</a> author Timothy Ferriss makes the claim that people with the most time and the highest incomes are characterized by the ability to single task: focusing on the truly important, without interruption, to completion. Here is a nice, short, edited video from the session:</p>
<p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:025c8256-1050-4765-bd18-40c2afc6f343" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div><object width="432" height="351">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.megavideo.com/v/CQUBMHZC555e6f3f993176158972f1b121244707.22862579.0"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.megavideo.com/v/CQUBMHZC555e6f3f993176158972f1b121244707.22862579.0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="432" height="351"></embed></object></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://tnni07.thenewnewinternet.com/agenda">entire keynote address</a> can be viewed on the <a href="http://tnni07.thenewnewinternet.com/">New New Internet Conference</a> site. </p>
<p>Here is a truism: people do not truly multi-task. <em>Multi-tasking</em>, in my opinion, is usually used to describe switching continuously between multiple <em>single</em> tasks over a period of time. So why not just work on one task at a time to completion, one after another? If we really cannot parallel process, the overall duration of completing all of the tasks is the same whether we do one thing at a time or try to &#8220;multi-task&#8221;. If you believe, <a href="http://www.apa.org/releases/multitasking.html">as many do</a>, that there is a task-switching cost associated with any switch from one task to another, then multi-tasking actually takes <em>more</em> time than performing single tasks at a time to completion.</p>
<p>One could then say that they must start one task before completing another because of a deadline. I would agree that a deadline is a practical implication, but it suggests prioritizing work by deadline, not the need to multi-task! In fact, task switching costs suggests that by prioritizing work and single tasking, we have the best shot at meeting these deadlines.</p>
<p>By the way, we often think that computers multi-task. Strictly speaking, for single processor machines, that is not technically accurate. CPU&#8217;s work on a single task at a time, and multi-tasking is emulated by having some sort of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_switch">task switching</a> scheme built into hardware or operating system software. Just like humans, there can be a substantial performance penalty for a computer to task switch.</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Single+Tasking&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F01%2F16%2Fsingle-tasking%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/16/single-tasking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clutter</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/13/clutter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/13/clutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elimination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/13/clutter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4-Hour Workweek credo describes the concept of elimination - eliminating or otherwise offloading the tasks that take up 80% of our time and yet add no, or only incremental value. It is not a matter of better organizing the time you spend on tasks (i.e. classic time management) but doing only the tasks that [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Clutter", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/13/clutter/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=374929&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">The 4-Hour Workweek</a> credo describes the concept of <em>elimination</em> - eliminating or otherwise offloading the tasks that take up 80% of our time and yet add no, or only incremental value. It is not a matter of better organizing the time you spend on tasks (i.e. classic time management) but doing only the tasks that really matter. You could say that one is eliminating <em>task clutter</em> - all those activities that literally clutter your time. And Let&#8217;s face it, when you have to remember when and what to do all the time, task clutter inevitably leads to <em>mental clutter</em> (New Theory: mental clutter is directly proportional to stress). Elimination frees your time <em>and</em> your mind!</p>
<p>There is another dimension to elimination, and that is reducing real, physical clutter. This is all the stuff in our homes and workplaces that we don&#8217;t really use, at best taking up space, at worse requiring maintenance and attention (leading to more task and mental clutter). A number of years ago, my wife and I moved into a new, larger house. For some reason, as a society, it seems our houses get bigger and bigger, but I digress&#8230; The interesting thing about larger spaces: you find a way to fill them up, and that&#8217;s exactly what we proceeded to do: our new house just gave us an excuse to buy, collect and store more stuff. </p>
<p>Last summer we realized that our house was actually filling up with <em>junk</em>.&nbsp; What we were accumulating was often not being used at all. In a stroke of brilliance, we decided we needed to have a garage sale and clear it out. We started going through our house, first in our &#8220;storage&#8221; areas and then our closets. At first when you are going through your stuff you usually come up with some reason to hold onto it. To get by this roadblock we developed a <em>one year rule</em>: if we have not used something in over one year it was a candidate for our garage sale. As we identified stuff that met this criteria, we staged it inside our garage where we would perform a final decision on whether something stayed or went. The funny thing was just getting things into this staging area ended up being 90% of the battle. Nothing we staged came back inside, and in fact inspired us to identify more items we did not need.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, I spent perhaps a full day of effort between setting up and holding the actual garage sale. I made about $200. It was a great way to meet people in the area and also nice to know that some of our stuff might find use with someone else. Beyond this, there were so many benefits to this exercise:</p>
<ul>
<li>There was a lot of stuff that did not even make it into our garage sale and went directly in the trash. The whole thing doubled as a spring cleaning exercise! </li>
<li>Seeing the sheer volume of stuff that we were willing to part with, all in one spot, made us realize that a lot of things we had bought over the years were really quite unnecessary. We now have a <em>garage sale rule</em> when we are shopping: if there is a chance that at item we are considering might end up in a garage sale, we put it down.</li>
<li>Freeing up space was actually mentally liberating. We have found that less clutter in our space eliminates a lot of mental distraction.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the end, the garage sale itself was probably not worth my effort, but the exercise of preparing for it was priceless.&nbsp; In the future I would either simply donate any items of value to charity, or put it on the curb with a big &#8220;Free&#8221; sign (a friend tells me he had a big piece of plywood with &#8220;Free&#8221; spray painted on it that he would regularly use for just such a purpose - ironically the sign itself was also taken by someone!).</p>
<p>This is just a story about a single battle, but the war against clutter still rages with me and others. Resources and tactics:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/clutter/">Lifehacker (tagged as Clutter)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://unclutterer.com/">Unclutterer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://zenhabits.net/tags/simplicity/">zenhabits (tagged as Simplicity)</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=Clutter&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F01%2F13%2Fclutter%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/01/13/clutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
