<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The 4-Hour Workweek Journal &#187; Hype Cycle</title>
	<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com</link>
	<description>One man's experiment in lifestyle design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The 4-Hour Workweek Hype Cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/10/the-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/10/the-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hype Cycle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[4-hour workweek]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gartner]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[management fads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal Productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/10/the-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gartner uses the Hype Cycle to describe how the hype regarding a new technology is often followed by a period of disappointment and subsequently by a period of more modest practical benefits:
&#160; 
Source: Jeremy Kemp / Wikipedia.
If we also consider management fads and personal productivity movements as technologies, I think one would find that the [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "The 4-Hour Workweek Hype Cycle", url: "http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/10/the-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Gartner" href="http://www.gartner.com/">Gartner</a> uses the <em>Hype Cycle</em> to describe how the hype regarding a new technology is often followed by a period of disappointment and subsequently by a period of more modest practical benefits:</p>
<p>&nbsp;<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg/559px-Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg.png"> </p>
<p>Source: <a title="Hype Cycle" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp">Jeremy Kemp / Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p>If we also consider management fads and personal productivity movements as technologies, I think one would find that the hype cycle equally applies to these as well. For example, there has been <a title="why GTD sucks" href="http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/10/9-reasons-why-getting-things-done-sucks/">a lot of talk</a> in the blogosphere about GTD entering the &#8220;trough of disillusionment&#8221;. Where in the hype cycle is <a title="4-hour workweek" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">The 4-Hour Workweek</a>? </p>
<p>Personally, I think it is still in the &#8220;peak of inflated expectations&#8221; phase. The book remains wildly popular. My prediction is that people, specifically salaried employees, are going to have problems liberating themselves from the office environment. If they can even achieve mobility in the first place, the next challenge will be automating sizeable amounts of work via personal outsourcing (the single biggest issue I hear from 4-hour workweek readers is &#8220;what can I outsource?&#8221; often accompanied by explanations built around client confidentiality, etc.). I have already commented in my post <a title="4-Hour Workweek Skeptic" href="http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/07/4-hour-workweek-easier-said-than-done/">The 4-Hour Workweek: Easier Said Than Done</a> on some of the reasons to be skeptical. So, like almost all personal effectiveness movements, I am certain <a title="4-hour workweek" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">The 4-Hour Workweek</a> will go through the inevitable trough of disillusionment. I am also equally sure it will rebound, especially since some have already been successful in applying the principles - so there is something real here.</p>
<p>Where do you think <a title="4-hour workweek" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307353133?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=4houworweejou-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0307353133">The 4-Hour Workweek</a> is in its hype cycle? Do you even think the hype cycle applies?</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.1&amp;publisher=40516e72-4723-4a71-9a9a-46aca1e702b0&amp;title=The+4-Hour+Workweek+Hype+Cycle&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fourhourworkweekjournal.com%2F2008%2F03%2F10%2Fthe-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fourhourworkweekjournal.com/2008/03/10/the-4-hour-workweek-hype-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
