Productivity

The 4 Secrets To Doing More In Less Time

Broken Time
Creative Commons License photo credit: dSeneste.dk

How do you get more done in less time? Business Insider recently presented the results of a study by Dr. K. Anders Ericcson in which the musicians were evaluated to see what the best performers did differently from the rest. The four significant practices of top performers:

  1. Work for shorter periods of time: 4 hours of deliberate, hard work is more effective than 7 hours of steady work. By working for shorter periods of time, you are motivated to optimize each working session since you know it is limited in length.
  2. Set goals for each work session: Leo Babauta at Zen Habits describes this as having three Most Important Tasks for each day - the goals that must be accomplished that day. Before starting any work session, know what you want to accomplish.
  3. Take Breaks: In Dr. Ericcson's study, they found the best performers took significant breaks between their intense work sessions. I'm much more productive in the afternoons if I take a long break for lunch and hit the gym. Enlightened work environments even encourage afternoon naps.
  4. Rest and Recuperate: I've mentioned this before - when we put our work aside it percolates in our subconscious. Our minds have a great way of working things out in the background. There are countless stories of scientists and inventors literally solving big problems in their sleep! They immerse themselves in the problem, and then when they put is aside and sleep, they wake up with the solution. There is a good reason the advice to “sleep on it” is given out so often: it works!

Read More: Why Successful People Leave Work Early.

Popularity: 3% [?]

News Addiction: 3 Ways To Break The Habit

No Comments » Written on March 5th, 2011 by Brick
Categories: Articles, Productivity

According to my twitter stream, Rolf Dobelli made a case at TED this week for avoiding news at all costs. According to Rolf:

News is to the mind what sugar is to the body...News is easy to digest. The media feeds us small bites of trivial matter, tidbits that don’t really concern our lives and don’t require thinking...We are beginning to recognize how toxic news can be and we are learning to take the first steps toward an information diet.

In the paper that led to his talk at TED, Rolf describes in detail all the dangers of news, including the costs of following it. He personally went without news for over a year, and describes the freedoms he gained:

  • less disruption
  • more time
  • less anxiety
  • deeper thinking
  • more insights

It's a pretty compelling paper. Rolf isn't the first one to advocate avoiding the news, and I used to do this fairly successfully. At one time I made a point of not watching the news on television or reading it on-line. I had an extended stay at the hospital last year, and with my computer, newspapers and a lot of idle time, I admit that I fell into the news trap and even up to today, Google News is a diversion several times a day. Well, that stops now. Here's how I plan to break the habit:

  1. Block news websites. After reading Rolf's paper I toyed with the idea of creating a browser extension to block news sites, but of course there is already an app for that! If you use Chrome, consider trying the StayFocused or SiteBlock extensions. I've tried them both out. The former is more feature rich and more geared towards setting time limits on viewing certain sites (which can be set up to include whatever news sites are slowly killing your mind), while the latter is a very simple url blocker. However they can both be set up to block something completely or set time limits.
  2. Stop watching the news on television. This can easily be achieved by simply canceling cable. Cancel any newspaper or news magazine subscriptions.
  3. Get out and do something else. When you have to read, read books.

On that last point I have a good story: I've always enjoyed watching professional hockey live and on television. A friend once asked me why I just didn't play hockey instead of watching others play it if I liked it so much. Good Advice.

Creative Commons License photo credit: Tom T

Popularity: 5% [?]

Productivity Secrets of Highly Successful People

1 Comment » Written on January 25th, 2010 by Brick
Categories: Articles, Productivity

I watched this interview of Matt Rissell by Robert Scoble (The “Scobleizer”) for Fast Company “TV” (I remember Fast Company being a pretty cool magazine in the 90’s). Matt is the CEO of TSheets, a Boise-based provider of online timeclocks. He discusses how he determined what made the most productive people successful. He provides “10 productivity secrets”. I really liked the following two:

Surround yourself with excellent people: Matt goes out of this way to point out that this is not “hire excellent people”. I think this is really important for freelancers, and entrepreneurs who don’t necessarily have the budget or need for employees in the traditional sense. As the saying goes, “show me your friends, and I’ll show you your future”. As an entrepreneur, you don’t have to hire excellence. You can surround yourself with excellent advisors, excellent suppliers, excellent mentors and yes, excellent (entrepreneurial) friends.

Make your decisions be great: Again, notice that this is not “make great decisions”. I think the key is that you have to be courageous enough to make a choice and put a stake in the sand. You then move forward and don’t look back second guessing or having regrets. Just choose that where you are is the place to be.

“…act like wherever you are, that's the place to be."

-Mike Damone, Fast Times at Ridgemount High

 

Here’s the full video:

Popularity: 49% [?]

The Art of Time Estimation

No Comments » Written on January 19th, 2010 by Brick
Categories: Articles, Productivity

Ah, perhaps the quintessential question in a world where we are starved for time: how long will it take? It could be anything really: a project, a meeting, a visit to the dentist, picking up the kids from school, or going to the grocery store. Working in software, I continually have to answer this question when asked how long it will take to release the next version, implement a new feature, or fix a bug. However, budgeting our time affects our personal lives as much as it might our professional lives.

Over the years, I have developed Brick’s Law of Time Estimation. It works like this: when asked how long it will take to do x, think about it for as long as is practical, but don’t stress over the estimation. If you only have a few moments to come up with an answer, you can rely on your subconscious and just go with how long you intuitively think it will take. If you have time to put pen to paper, you might look at past experience, factor in the resources available, add a buffer for contingency, etc. In any event, by all means do your due diligence, but don’t stress over whether you considered everything or not. Let’s say you guessed that x will take you y (minutes / hours / days / whatever). Your final, best estimate will be as follows:

Time to do x = 2y

That’s it! Take your best guess and simply multiply that by 2. You’d be surprised how accurate this method can be.

Seriously, I have seen project management books that suggest calculating such an estimate as follows:

Time to do x = 3((t/r)^0.333)

where t is the overall level of effort in units of time per resource, and r is the number of resources. Wow – how does one even attempt to take a number to the power of one third in their head when they are just planning a trip to the store? My method is better because it is simpler. I win. Intuitively factor in the resources at hand into your best guess and multiply by 2. What could be easier?

Let’s run through an example: Your friend telephones, “how soon can you be over here?”. You start thinking to yourself “well, she’s about a 15 minute drive away, and I need 5 minutes to wash up before I leave, so I could be there in 20 minutes”. Wrong! Where’s the time to find your keys? Where’s the time to account for the traffic signal being down and having to wait through some unexpected traffic? Where’s the buffer for anything else Murphy throws at you? This is what you say: “I can be there in 40 minutes.” You put down the phone. You wash up, and you actually have your keys, but you can’t find your cell phone. You call your cell from the home phone to locate it by ring tone, and so what if it takes an extra 5 minutes. No traffic problems, but you realize you need some cash along the way – no problems, just stop at an ATM, you’ve got loads of time. You get to your friend’s place 34 minutes after you put down the phone. You are happy and relaxed. She admires your promptness, your respect for her time, and how you are one calm, cool and collected person. You achieve time management greatness.

Popularity: 47% [?]

Remembering The Milk

All productivity geeks, including the Getting Things Done ("GTD") priestly class, seem to have a "system". A system is a set of tools and procedures for collecting, processing and dealing with all the tasks and other material that crosses one's (perhaps metaphorical) desk.  My "system" had relied on Sandy. As fans of that application are painfully aware, Sandy died a horrible death sometime in December. While dealing with grief issues, the logical part of my brain needed to focus on finding a tool to deal with this gap in my beloved "system". I had considered using Remember The Milk ("RTM"). Well, here is my update.

The basis of RTM is the concept of tasks. Like Sandy, tasks can be tagged, have a due date, include a url and a location. While Sandy used special tags like "@todo", RTM allows you to organize tasks into lists. So being the Getting Things Done wannabe I am, I created the following lists:

  • Action Items
  • Someday
  • Waiting On

These are fairly self explanatory. Since RTM integrates with Google Calendars, I also have the following list where I add tasks with due dates that are part of the hard landscape of my schedule:

  • Calendar

Lastly, I created lists for all my major projects. The one area where RTM really shines is their Smart Lists. Basically, any search you perform on all of your items can be saved as a smart list. It is like the concept of a "view" in a database - as tasks are added, modified and deleted, the smart lists are automatically updated to include the latest list of tasks that meet the criteria defined for them. This is great for readily identifying tasks in a given context. For example, I may have any number of items tagged as "errand". These items may exist in my Action Item, Someday, Calendar, or one of my project lists. A smart list based on all items tagged "errand" immediately provides me with a list of items relevant to that specific context! If I am about to get in the car to do some shopping, I can click on my "errand" smart list and see if I can knock off any tasks while I am in that context (you can also access RTM from your Blackberry and iPhone). So for me, context, which might include things like:

  • Errands
  • Phone Calls
  • Home Maintenance
  • At The Computer

are all handled via tagging and smart lists.

Improvements

The most glaring weakness with RTM, and this as a consequence of my having been using Sandy, is the ability to send RTM a list of tasks in a single email. When I am working through my email inbox (already well integrated), I like to fire off tasks to RTM. RTM allows you to add one task per email if you update RTM that way. That's a severe limitation I would like addressed. I suppose I should spring for the pro account and submit this request. Money talks!

Popularity: 100% [?]

Never Check Email

2 comments Written on December 29th, 2008 by Brick
Categories: Articles, Productivity

I know, that's just silly. How about this instead: don't check email in the morning? I watched a great video featuring Julie Morgenstern, the author of, coincidentally enough, Never Check E-Mail In the Morning: And Other Unexpected Strategies for Making Your Work Life Work:

 

This idea of not checking email in the morning plays off of the idea of working on one's Most Important Task before all else, and/or doing the most difficult challenging thing first (as in to Eat That Frog). One thing I liked in the interview was Julie discussing the traits of poor workers:

  • Inaccessibility: This is the boss that is never around, but it can also be the employee who always puts others off, or who can never have an impromptu meeting or call.
  • Not Walking the Talk: We think that saying "yes" to everything may makes us agreeable and nice, but in fact, if saying yes to everything causes us not to be able to come through on some items, we are doing significant damage to our credibility.
  • Multitasking: I've written on this before. However, multitasking also includes responding to email, or surfing the Internet while on a call, or responding to the Blackberry during a meeting.
  • Clutter: This is not about what is looks like, but really about whether it is functional. If you can find what you need immediately, you don't have "clutter". If you cannot find things, consider reading Getting Things Done.

I have not read Julie's book yet, but it is definitely on my list of books to check out.

Popularity: 51% [?]

Email Disclaimers

1 Comment » Written on December 8th, 2008 by Brick
Categories: Articles, Productivity

What I would like to see is a standard set for appending legal disclaimers to emails. In this way email client software could hide all this silly text. The email software could, for example, add a link with something like "This email contains disclaimers. Click here to read". Or even simpler, could we just not put a simple link to the disclaimer instead of adding it to each and every email? I heard that the ability to "hyperlink" has become available on the web.

I just read a thread of email where the content was over 80% of the form:

This e-mail (and attachment(s)) is confidential, proprietary, may be  subject to copyright and legal privilege and no related rights are waived. If you are not the intended recipient or its agent, any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. All messages may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations and our policies to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and you are deemed to have accepted any risk if you communicate with us by e-mail. If received in error, please notify us immediately and delete the e-mail (and any attachments) from any computer or any storage medium without printing a copy.

This is not efficient. When a lot of people are replying to these messages, it becomes too easy to miss the actual content when navigating around this "fine print". And that's the problem, in plain text email, there is no real substitute for actual fine print. By the way, while we are at it we could do the same for the email "signatures". 

Popularity: 43% [?]

So Long Sandy, Thanks For The Memories

I just got the news yesterday that Rael Dornfest is closing down iwantsandy. I have written glowingly about Sandy in the past. It seems that Rael has accepted a position with Twitter, and that's truly great. I am happy for him. The problem for me (because hey, why shouldn't this be about me) is that I have come to rely on Sandy! I was setting up reminders into 2010 using that system and now it appears I will lose all that. I wonder why Twitter, which apparently bought the intellectual property for iwantsandy, would not just keep the current system running while they figure out what they want to do with this technology?

Plan B

I have opened an account up over at Remember The Milk (RTM). My plan is for this service to replace my beloved Sandy. I had tailored Sandy around the system described in Getting Things Done (GTD), so I have had to figure out how to do the same in RTM. Here are a few links that describe using RTM for GTD and have helped to get me started:

Life goes on...

Popularity: 33% [?]

AwayFind

As some of you may know by now, Jared over at Technotheory has released his AwayFind service. Inspired by Tim Ferriss' 4-Hour Workweek, this service allows urgent messages to get through to you without you having to constantly monitor your email. I can see this as a must-have service for sales professionals.

There is a free plan, and if you sign up before tomorrow you also get a free ebook "Guide to NOT Checking Email" as an added bonus! There also appears to be big savings on the paid plans if you sign up for those by tomorrow.

This is a great service: wonderfully simple in concept, immensely useful in practice. Be sure to check it out.

Popularity: 27% [?]

Finger Blasters

There once was a group of executives from a highly successful technology company on retreat. You all know this kind of off-site meeting - usually organized by the human resources or marketing types - they often include adventure/survival type games as team building exercises. On this particular retreat, one task put to the executives was particularly challenging. In the middle of a wooded area stood a 15 foot wall. The challenge was to devise a method to get the whole group over the wall using only themselves and materials they could find in the woods nearby. They immediately set to work by brainstorming ideas. These were evaluated one at a time, and after evaluating all of them, the most promising idea was selected based on the thoughtful analysis of the team. They then developed a plan to implement the idea, assigning roles and responsibilities. Once everyone knew what they had to do individually, they executed their plan, and everyone got over the wall. They worked marvelously as a team, and their well thought out plan worked as anticipated. A smashing success, and a good time had by all.

Unfortunately, while they were successful, they were not the most successful at this challenge. It so happened that earlier that week a group of grade school kids (also on a retreat) had also gotten themselves over the wall, but in less time! Their method: someone would yell out an idea. They would try it, and when it did not work, someone would shout out another idea. They would then try that, and so on until finally one of the ideas actually worked and everyone got over the wall.

Ironically, I heard this story at a corporate retreat! In my case, it was many years ago, but I am quite sure many of you may have been told a similar story. It speaks to the dichotomy between massive trial and error and the typical analyze, forecast, plan and execute approach we usually use at work. I was reminded of this story recently when reading Nassim Taleb's The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. In this book, Taleb argues that many (if not most) real world phenomena have more in common with black swans than bell curve distributions. If we have never seen a black swan, we assume all swans are white. We forecast and plan based on this assumption and it all goes to hell when one single black swan shows up. For example, it's hard to think anyone could have forecast the emergence and popularity of the iPod. It's a black swan - not predictable, but world changing. How do we create our own black swans? Since we cannot plan it we are left with massive trial and error.

This was reinforced for me last week when Garr Reynolds' excellent blog Presentation Zen highlighted Tim Brown's presentation on Play at TED where he discusses the virtues of quantity (of ideas) and massive experimentation (what he calls "play"):

 

How many great products came about because someone was "playing around" with something, or some idea? Probably the majority of them. As Taleb points out, if we could forecast the next great thing, we would be doing that next great thing now!

Popularity: 18% [?]